Following the Lesson Plan
When we initially did research for the Substitute Teacher Handbook, we found that on average, permanent teachers spent roughly 45 minutes putting together lesson plans for substitute teachers. When we hear from district personnel and permanent teachers, their message is the same. They want substitute teachers to follow the permanent teacher's lesson plan.
What is your biggest challenge when it comes to following the lesson plan?
Share your thoughts as a comment below.




Subscribe to the most informative substitute teacher newsletters by STEDI.org!
(Comment Moderation is enabled. Your comment will not appear until approved.)
That said, supplies/material are not immediately at hand and minutes are spent trying to locate them, leaving less time to read the plan and get some idea of what's to be covered and timing before the class enters.
Sometimes the lesson plan is no more than busy work that the students either finish quickly or blow off knowing it's make work. I attempt to use it as a class project, keeps behavioral problems down. And if possible make it germain to their classwork or other classes.
I also will spend more time on vocabulary and comprehension than I believe most teachers expect.
If there is time games that have some relation to subject can be played.
Materials. As much as possible, all materials should be on the teacher's desk, or written where to find them.
Comments. It would greatly help the subs if each teacher put comments about his/her classes on Aesop, such as the schedule, the number of students in each class, and class level. This would enable us to bring material relating to those subjects, which to me is vital, and to bring enough copies for the early classes. Later in the day we would have time to make copies for the later classes.
I always leave notes why I could not follow the lesson plans including Smartboard was not working, could not find appropriate link or file on desktop, or students were not cooperative, etc.
I was totally embarrassed to only give him what amounted to one find-a-word puzzle. That was the only work left by a teacher. He looked at me and said "you've got to be kidding."
Do a survey and ask us Subs, "what percentage of the time do you get a sufficient lesson plan?" I would say less than half.
Ans then there are those "packets" and students can "work in groups." In other words, students will be noisy and not on task for the entire class.
Folders are great only when there are good labels on everything. If books are laid out, especially teacher manuals, make sure to notate which page number, not just follow the sticky notes. Many teacher manuals have multiple things marked with stickies.
You also have to make decisions on your own. If a science assignment takes more than an hour for students to complete, do you continue science until all students are finished and miss some of the math lesson or stop science after an hour and miss some of the science lesson that you did not get to do?
and/or out-load readings, student presentations are sometimes very difficult to accomplish if/when there are disruptive students. I usually can work around bored and uninvolved students if they leave others alone. I realize my limitations -- so I walk around constantly, encouraging [sometimes gently nagging] classwork to get started, to get finished, to get turned in -- the grade-book never lies, it records what the students have/have not done. Re-enforcing the lesson plan again and again, encouraging the students each class-period/block. I leave notes praising the school, the staff, the teachers for all they do every day. I'm thankful to have work within the 3 ISDs I sub in.
In this case they became very disruptive. I pulled out my Substitute Handbook and went to chapter six "critical thinking" [filler activities]. After dividing the room into two teams - A and B - the challenge was on. I won over 99% of the students and they had a blast. One student quoted, "I can't believe she is a substitute teacher".
This was also utilized during my Psychology classes. They had projects to work on, but felt socializing was more fun. I pulled out the same exercise and they, too, had a blast!
I did inform the teacher of my actions and left copies of what we covered in "Mind Benders and Rittles" - chapter six, "critical thinking".
It's hardest when missing key content information or materials. For example, making a poster w/o markers or magazines & 2 pairs of scissors is a crummy plan. "Teach a Say, Means, Matters chart" is not helpful, since I've never heard of one & am not sure how you want it taught. I tried looking it up on a nearby computer and asking other teachers w/o success. The previous day's sub left a similar note on the desk. It would take a few sentences to explain it to me and make reading the textbook much more interactive, but I think it's better to not teach it than teach it wrong.
Also, often the teacher doesn't hold the kids accountable for the work/information they do on "sub days" so kids do nothing. "He's just going to go over it again when he gets back, so I'll do it then."
A few times, I've run into the teachers in the room before. When they teach me (model) the lesson quickly, it always goes well, because they include all the little things they do like procedures & code words the kids understand.
I guess my request for permanent teachers is to *model* their lesson in the plans, not just summarize it.
Recently, I followed a lesson plan given, and the activity was one that the students already had completed and in order to complete it again, I had to locate the paper required, and there wasn't enough copies the second time we did it! Luckily, there was aide in the room and she was a great help. I have also been in a classroom where I tried to do the lesson left for the students, and it was above what the students could do! The assignment was clearly busy-work and the students knew it.
Furthermore, I have found that many teachers neglect to put in a guide for the routine that goes on. For the pupils, it is rather apparent that they depend on this schedule. Many times as a sub, I have found that breaking the routine (inevitable, because the sub has not participated in the process of creating and understanding the daily practices and times) causes many students to be uncomfortable and many to be disruptive.
Indeed, the previous two points of trust and schedule are but the surface of a giant dialogue of school and it's inherent cultures, but I find them to be the most influential when it comes to the ability to follow lesson plans. I will finish with the sentiment that when a substitute walks into a classroom that has cultivated inquiry, adaptability, and understanding, the lesson plan will be easier to complete as directed, but when a classroom is based more on behavior, it becomes a more difficult task.
Furthermore, one time I complained to administration about the students not wanting to do anything in class and the person I spoke to was upset that according to him "I wasn't keeping control of the classroom." Can we as subs force a student to do anything? or even can the permanent teacher force a student to work in class? I am sure the answer is no. In one school I went to, the school's policy goes as far as prohibiting substitutes to write referrals on anyone. So that means that the sub is left to just babysit and render him or her powerless. However, I have seen substitutes over- react with students and write up any student for the dumbest of reasons.
I think that administrations in every school is to give the same support to a sub that is given to their permanent teacher. We, SUBS, look after your students when you are gone and yet we get less respect from both administration and teachers we replace for that day. We get less respect from students and we get more disruption and attitude from students, and why? Because the students know that subs are treated as third class teachers who have no support from administration. In many cases students even know that a sub has no power in the classroom and thats the reason they act the way they do.
So, is not that the sub is side tracking from a lesson plan. The problem lies elsewhere.
Teachers don't leave lists of their students; I was asked to teach students how to use a protractor and measuring different angles; well, I fell pretty short here. The answers were not there for me to know whether the students had correct answers; I constantly have to look all over the room for materials needed for the day; All this makes students "think" that we are not real teachers which is not good.
I like it most, when the regular teacher considers the difficulty of substituting, and that they don't assume that the sub will know exactly what to do.
Sometimes, for instance the regular teacher assigns work and indicates that what is not finished will be homework. To me that is just a signal that the students can "chill" and complete the worksheet for homework, which often means the class time will be social time. It makes it a lot easier if the regular teacher requests that students turn in the work at the end of the class.
Also, when the teacher indicates that students may "work together," some of the students will socialize and copy the work from the students that were on task and working.
I like specifics; students may not sit with whomever they please and they may NOT work together (unless it is a group project).
It also helps when a teacher, especially a math teacher, leaves an answer key for the assigned work. Don't assume that the sub will be a math major. Explain the steps needed, for example, to solve algebra problems
I will be performing my student teaching in January, so subbing has definitely helped me. I will appreciate the work that a sub has to do as a result of subbing myself.
When I am a regular teacher, one of the most important things for me will be to leave detailed plans for a sub.